Future proof,Taxi and Private Hire Services in London


Click the link below to read the The London Assembly Transport Committee response and recommendations for the Taxi and Private Hire Trade.

Future Proof Taxi and Private Hire Services in London


The LCDC welcomes the GLA report into TfL.

It raises many of the important issues that the LCDC have been raising with TfL over the past few years. If these GLA recommendations are implemented it could have a dramatic effect on ensuring the safety for the travelling public.

The Club has always believed that the Surface Implementation Programme would have disastrous consequences for our trade, the fact that only a couple of Saturdays ago there were only 4 compliance officers out for the whole of London justifies our concerns.

We believe that after many years of pressure our fears for the future are finally being recognised by others outside our industry

Grant Davis

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Reply

Transport for London Board Statement – Uber Wednesday 10 December 2014

Earlier today, Leon Daniels gave the following statement to the TfL Board with a summary of the position regarding Uber, especially following the numerous stories in the media about activities worldwide.

Uber remains a licensed PH operator in London, fulfilling the requirements as set out in private hire legislation.

There have been various stories in the media about their activities and the sanctions applied in other countries and other jurisdictions. We note all of these, but the laws in those jurisdictions are different.

In one case, it was reported that Uber had shown, at a public event, the location of a famous personality in an Uber vehicle. This we regarded very seriously as a potential breach of privacy.

We took steps to immediately look into this and Uber London Ltd gave us an absolute assurance that no data about individuals was ever released.

This week there is also a story about a case where an Uber driver in India has been arrested on a charge of rape involving a passenger in his vehicle. As far as we are aware no one has yet been convicted of any offence.

There has been a concern from the taxi trade that individuals could be licensed as drivers from countries where the current DBS checks cannot be obtained. The position regarding drivers who have recently arrived in the UK and apply for a private hire driver’s licence remains the same as before. To be licensed, and in the absence of a DBS check, a certificate of good conduct is required from the Embassy of the country of origin. This discloses any offences that have been recorded against the individual.

I should remind Board Members this is a long standing requirement which applies to all PH drivers and predates the arrival of Uber in this market. I would also repeat that all PH operators are subject to periodic compliance checks. The last check at Uber was found to be satisfactory but in common with all operators further checks will take place at a time of our choosing.

Lastly, Board Members will recall that there remains the issue of whether or not the smartphone provided by Uber to its drivers is a taximeter as defined in private hire legislation and if it is whether or not Uber private hire vehicles are unlawfully equipped with it. Whilst we have already stated that we do not think it is, we accept that the law is open to a different interpretation having been written well before the advent of such devices.

Because the law is unclear we have said that the appropriate way forward is to seek a declaration from the High Court – which of course we will enforce.

This might well have been concluded by now. However, the LTDA chose to bring a private prosecution in the Magistrates’ Court against a small number of Uber drivers on the taximeter issue. The High Court does not have jurisdiction to consider applications for a declaration whilst there are on-going prosecutions in the criminal courts in relation to the same legal issue. Recently the Magistrate dealing with the prosecutions concluded that the matter was rightly the province of the High Court.

However, the LTDA did not agree to withdraw the criminal summonses and the case was adjourned indefinitely to allow us to pursue our application to the High Court.

However, since the criminal case remains outstanding, we are of the view that the High Court will still not accept an application for a declaration as we would wish.

For this reason we have written to the LTDA asking them to withdraw their criminal summonses. Unless and until they do so, we will remain in a position where the very concerns of the taxi trade that we are trying to resolve cannot be progressed because of the actions of the LTDA..

Taxi Liaison Meeting 26/9/14 LCDC Report


Transport for London (TfL) and Heathrow Ltd (HAL) confirmed that the Taxi Feeder Park charge was to remain in place and drivers could still apply the Extra after the TfL Surface Transport Panel meeting that took place on the day of the demo.

Next item on the Agenda was a FINANCIAL REVIEW from HAL regarding detailed figures for the Taxi Feeder Park and contributions to the various bodies that operate at Heathrow including the Police.

HAL informed the Trade that genuine cost savings had been made giving efficiency savings of about £250,000. Costs that are normally recovered from the Cab Trade amount to over £2 million; this has been reduced to £1.8m

Consequently the current £5.22 Entry charge will reduce to £3.54 or £3.18, but a deal has been offered to make that £3.38 for 24 months until a review in September 2016. The new charge will apply from January 1st 2015.

The Trade were told the Allocated Costs include Policing and Support Services and promised more information. Annual Total Policing Costs at Heathrow amount to £36.8 million.

Information on how much money Heathrow Police receive from the Taxi Trade is currently not available from either HAL or the Police. The facts of the matter are being investigated by the LCDC. According to HAL, policing costs are lumped together with costs relating to the provision and management of the Taxi Feeder Park.

Reps asked that a refund for ‘Blowing Out’ at night be looked at again after the projections for next year were made. Previously the Trade had been told an additional fee of 17p would be incurred for the software change necessary but this will now be looked at after it was revealed the fee to enter the Feeder Park will drop substantially.

There followed a brief report on TOUTING/ENFORCEMENT by the Police who were heavily criticised by Taxi reps for failing to use the bye-laws to stop minicabs from picking up from the Set Down points on the passenger terminals. The Police were unable to explain why they were failing to deal with this major problem. Cab Enforcement will be challenging PH/Taxi Drivers for Badges and Bills on Ranks and in Terminals.

The Trade were informed that there are only four officers in the Tout Squad. This is obviously under resourced even when backed up by TPCSO’s.

However, the Police were able to hold another successful operation involving local Council and Immigration Officers which they hope to repeat every 6 weeks. 485 Drivers were stopped and checked during the operation.

It was suggested by Reps that using Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) Cameras, be employed to monitor forecourts more effectively as the congestion is horrendous at times, particularly Terminal 4 at night on Weekends.

In their report, APCOA said they had now reached a full complement of staff: there are 37 Rank Agents of which 22 are Experienced Staff. However, there are still too many incidents like this one on Terminal 2 last weekend where customers queued to get into Taxis whilst Cabs queued to reach customers!

The Meeting overran its allocated slot but there were additional initial discussions on a BUSINESS PROPOSAL which included a DISCIPLINARY SCHEME or CODE OF CONDUCT with TERMS & CONDITIONS.

The LCDC emphasised the need for the trade to ensure that any plans to weed out the few bad drivers at Heathrow would not include putting them on trial at a kangeroo court.

This followed on from questions which were asked about the source of HAL’s authority to suspend a driver in order to produce a workable scheme.

Taxi Trade Reps would be interested to hear Drivers opinions which can be sent to:



Mercedes Benz statement RE KPM-UK Taxis PLC


KPM-UK Taxis PLC Statement

Mercedes-Benz Vans has removed the Taxi franchise from KPM-UK Taxis PLC, based in East London.

We are working hard to ensure our customers are supported during this time and all existing workshop bookings and customer vehicle deliveries are being distributed among local Mercedes-Benz Commercial Vehicle Dealerships.

We are contacting all customers affected by the removal of the franchise from KPM-UK Taxis PLC.

If customers are concerned, they can contact Mercedes-Benz customer service via cs.uk@cac.mercedes-benz.
com or call 00800 9777 7777 or 0207 660 9993.


The Mercedes-Benz Commercial Vehicle Dealers with a full knowledge and broad experience of the Vito Taxi are:

· Mercedes-Benz of Brentford LCV 0208 560 2151
· Mercedes-Benz of Croydon 0208 665 4540
· Mercedes-Benz of Park Royal 0208 896 1565
· Mercedes-Benz of Stratford 0208 221 4460
· Orwell Truck & Van Colchester 01206 751 550
· Rossetts Commercials Crawley 01293 652 560
· Rygor Commercials Heathrow 0208 890 8907
· S&B Commercials Stansted 01279 712 200
· S&B Commercials Welham Green 01707 261 111
· S&B Commercials West Thurrock 01708 892 500
· SG Smith Croydon 0208 665 7800
· SG Smith Sydenham 0208 659 3636
· Sparshatts of Kent Ltd (Ashford) 01233 610 400
· Sparshatts of Kent Ltd (Dartford) 01322 520 030
· Sparshatts of Kent Ltd (Sittingbourne) 01795 479 571
· Sparshatts of Kent Ltd (Tonbridge) 01732 370 920

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Reply

Heathrow’s CRISIS Meeting Report

From the meeting held on Thursday with HAL/APCOA over the Management of the Taxi Ranks.


In attendance:

Sean Taylor & Alison Crathorne APCOA; Andy Cameron HAL; Paul Brennan & Michael Calvey LTDA; Eddie Symes HATDU; Dennis Browne UNITE; Mark White LCDC.

Andy Cameron started the meeting by saying he had taken advice from Senior HAL Management prior to the meeting with the Trade and as much as they appreciated the Taxi Groups willingness to find a solution to the problems they were not prepared to allow Taxi Marshals/Reps to actively participate on Taxi Ranks.

However, did say he was happy for Taxi Marshals to advise and assist over local journeys/Fares Fair.

Sean Taylor offered additional ‘Attendants’ to help with trolleys etc. in and around the Ranks. He has also recruited an additional driver separate from Agents following an issue, last week, when there was no Agent on T4 during the morning rush hour on two occasions.

From our discussion we learned that NSL had lost the contract to APCOA back in early 2014 with the handover on April 1st (yes, really) with APCOA taking control of the Ranks on June 1st.

APCOA said they were unaware that 50% of Staff would leave even though they had changed the Terms and Conditions of the Staff. On June 13th, half the staff walked out without giving any notice.

We were told that there had been no wage reduction but rather a restructuring of the roster and shift patterns. Previously, the Agents had been self-employed; they are now employed and receive sick-pay and holidays.

There is, according to APCOA, no Labour cost difference. In fact, Sean was keen to point out that the average hourly working week of Agents is now less than before and there have been no staff cuts.

However, Dennis Browne, of Unite, was quick to point out that there had been a 50% Staff reduction on the Taxi Ranks by reducing the Agents from a Minimum of two to one.

Both Andy Cameron and Sean Taylor defended this position, but they failed to understand that the work levels could change at a moments notice with late flights or the HEX being suspended and that currently work levels are as low as most of the Cabbies have experienced in over 30 years.

To that end, we have asked for Facts & Figures to be supplied so that we can monitor the demand for Taxis and where those Taxis go. It was constantly pointed out by the Reps, that this is our business not HAL’s or APCOA’s and we are subject to TfL’s rules not Heathrow Bye-Laws.

Having discussed Wages and staffing levels, the Reps asked for copies of the Service Level Agreement. The conversation was difficult at times due to the current situation. It was eventually admitted that APCOA could be said to be in breach of their contract but Andy Cameron explained that he had put his own personal reputation on the line by backing Sean Taylor and had complete faith in both him and APCOA to resolve all the issues.

Again the Trade explained that that was why we were there and offering to help: that extra resources, over and above what had been suggested, was needed in the immediate short-term.

Again, Andy Cameron said that he was happy to discuss how we could constructively help but that he was going to decline our help.

Further discussion proved fruitless in that regard but the Trade have now offered to assist with monitoring Training to help get Agents up to speed and made a number of suggestions as to how to improve the situation.

Sean Taylor has listened to our criticisms and agreed to bring in additional resources, over and above those mentioned earlier and it was reluctantly agreed that the Reps would observe to see if there were any improvements and report back to both Sean and Andy at another meeting in a week’s time.

In the meantime Drivers can email (feederparkinfo@gmail.com) with information related to issues at Heathrow in future and the comments/pictures with be collated and relayed to the relevant Authorities.

If there is no obvious improvement in the service provided to us, then the Taxi Trade will have to look to pursue other avenues.

TfL, so far, have failed to show any interest in the situation on the Ranks at Heathrow, and have not attended meetings for years.

Darren Crowson said earlier in the week: “As you are aware Heathrow Airport Limited is responsible for the management of these taxi ranks and so it is for them to determine how the dispatch system operates, who they chose to act as marshals at the ranks or if they wish to relinquish control of the taxi system.”

This situation cannot continue and T&PH will be hearing from the Trade in the forthcoming week.

There was a further meeting held at the Airport by the Heathrow Taxi Group to discuss what happens next and to begin the process of agreeing an Agenda for the next meeting with HAL. If any driver has a concern, please contact the Group on the email:


heathrow Airport Taxi Trade Meeting Update


The Taxi Trade was represented by Michael Calvey & Paul Brennan of the LTDA, Michael Callis of HATDU, Micky Samroo and Dennis Brown of UNITE and Mark White of the LCDC.

Peter Cannon of the Club and Eddie Symes, Chairman of HATDU, were both unable to attend due to HAL’s change of time and date and their annoyance at such late change of notice was relayed to Andy Cameron of HAL, who apologised, saying it was due to unforeseen circumstances. This did not sit well with the Reps, who accused HAL of treating the Taxi Trade at Heathrow with contempt.

The meeting started off with an update on the handover from NSL to APCOA which has been extremely poor. The Heathrow Taxi Reps listened to an account from Sean Taylor, the Manager of APCOA, of how hard they had worked to recruit and train staff, after 50% of the former NSL staff walked out over a change in the terms and conditions of their working practices.

Sean Taylor, when challenged that the staff had been offered less favourable terms and conditions argued that this was not true. The new staff are now employed rather than self-employed; they work 4 day shifts and 4 off, followed by 4 night shifts. They now do 12 hours a shift instead of the previous 8 and the hourly rate has been cut from £10/hour to £7.40. They now get paid holidays and sickness entitlement.

Andy Cameron defended Sean Taylor, saying that the loss of the Agents had been unforeseen. When the Trade Reps pointed out that it wasn’t hard to see what would happen if you cut worker’s pay, he suggested we bring our crystal ball to the next meeting! The handover had been unbelievably poor. Previously when NSL took over from Meteor, the vast majority of the staff moved seamlessly from one company to another.

This time over 50% left to find employment elsewhere and on one occasion, it was reported that staff had walked out leaving Sean Taylor to cover Cab-in staff and process Driver’s credits.

Both HAL & APCOA were criticised over the effect this has had on the Taxi business at the Airport; pictures of large queues were given to illustrate the fact and the Reps said the situation was unacceptable and needed to be rectified post-haste!

Rank Agent recruitment continues and APCOA’s Alison Crothorne said training would be done both in the classroom and on the job to bring Agents up to speed. However, it was pointed out that this should’ve been done prior to the handover, not after it.

Sean Taylor told us he had excellent man-management skills and would turn the situation around as quickly as he could. However, the longer it takes him the more business we lose: the more customers walk away from Taxi Ranks to go and get alternative transport. It was pointed out that this is happening whilst Drivers are waiting for longer periods than necessary in the Feeder Park and earning less money.

HAL’s Andy Cameron did not take too kindly to the criticism but promised that improvements would be made. The Reps probed how this would be done, criticising both the training given, the staffing levels which are insufficient and also the quality of staff hired.

Reps asked to be given Service Level Agreements that two Agents would be on all Terminals at all times and that Minimum Standards for Agents include good spoken English. It was then agreed, by Sean Taylor, that all his staff would wear their HAL ID’s and numbered bibs or jackets for the purpose of Identification.

Eventually the meeting moved on after an hour on the subject. Taxi Movement Data and Operational Matters were discussed.

Figures for Feeder Park costs and contributions were asked to be supplied as the Mayor of London has a Consultation on Heathrow in September. Peter Cannon, the Club’s senior Rep who was unable to attend, has already been liaising with Colin Fox, from HAL’s Accounts department and more detailed information was promised to help analysis.

Rank issues were raised with Andy Cameron, who was quick to say that he was in agreement with the Taxi Trade and that something had gone amiss with his original instructions. The Reps were assured that the matter would be given the most urgent attention and the site, signage and access would be improved and information improved through liaisons with TfL T&PH’s Darren Crowson, the infrastructure and strategy manager.

What made this even more annoying is that London Assembly Member, Caroline Pidgeon, was asked in January, when she visited the Construction site to look at the Cab Rank.

Caroline Pidgeon, Chair of the London Assembly’s Transport Committee at Heathrow.
The meeting then moved onto Touting and Enforcement. HAL had been informed that there had been several instances of staff in Terminals seen putting work into cars or soliciting Car Companies in the Terminals by the Cab Trade Taxi Marshals. There were also accounts of Heathrow Express staff giving misinformation to Passengers that resulted in lost fares or people told to use the HEX only to find that they now faced a Taxi to their onward destination from Paddington that would have been cheaper in a Taxi straight to their original destination from Heathrow.
Complaints about HOTEL DESKS, HEATHROW AMBASSADORS in Purple Jackets and BAA STAFF were promised further investigation by Heathrow’s Neel Gohil, including one instance where it was reported that a Windsor Taxi was seen having a fare put into his Cab.

It was also pointed out by the LTDA’s Paul Brennan that computer screens in the new Terminal 2, actually allowed Passengers to use the internet free to book Heathrow Taxis that linked them to Car Companies in breach of the Law. Further investigations were promised by Neel, who said he would put a stop to it.

Mike Bristo, of Heathrow Police, then told the Trade of the work he has been doing since his return to working at the Airport. He explained that new Bye-Laws will be used to enforce SET DOWN points and both Taxi and Private Hire cars will be asked to move on after two minutes stopping the practice, mainly by PH and out of Town Taxis, of picking up from all 5 Terminals without using the Car Parks.

Mike has promised us more details of what to expect and about future operations so that Taxi Drivers will be aware and not fall foul of new regulations that will see Drivers asked for their licences on the Terminals before being checked against new computerised records at TfL that were brought in by John Mason and should identify the correct person driving any Taxi or PH vehicle.

Mike Bristo went on to tell the Trade Reps that he hoped to hold a number of Operations at Heathrow checking on Cabs every 6 weeks instead of the average every 6 months that has been the norm However, he went on to say that in order to do this he had to be invited on to Heathrow Airport. It was pointed out to Mike, that after some excellent work by the Club’s Peter Cannon, and additional questions to Siwan Hayward, Deputy Director of Enforcement at TfL, that TfL and Cab Enforcement do not need to be officially invited to enforce legislation appertaining to or on Hackney Carriage’s or PH in London.

Therefore, the Trade should see more robust enforcement at the Airport which Peter Cannon is monitoring along with the other Trade Groups. Mike Bristo was given the relevant information at the end of the meeting.

Following the meeting, both Paul Brennan and Mark Shulton of the Taxi Marshals have agreed to set up some web addresses so that individual drivers can help the Trade collate instances of problems at Heathrow, in order to put them to the Authorities. Details will be posted in the Trade Press and at Heathrow.

There will also be additional web addresses so that faults in the Taxi Feeder Park can be reported.

The Trade was told that there is due to be Surface Upgrade works due to Feeder Park Survey carried out in May: it was asked that the Feeder Park Exit be looked at due to increased traffic and visibility be improved. The conditions of Toilets/Canteen block including road surface, crossing, lights and fences will also be looked at and Paul and Mark will be recording incidents and faults for further reports.

Brief news was given about the Fuel Station, which has reopened: there should be more details at a later date.

Andy Cameron then proposed a review of conditions for Taxi Drivers Operating at Heathrow Airport. Peter Cannon is due to have further discussions before responding on behalf of the LCDC with regard to issues over mandatory Credit Card and other BAA Business proposals that included changes to the Local Journey system and compellability.

There are Consultations with the Mayor and TfL over Credit Cards and Heathrow Airport later in the year plus the London Assembly are holding an Investigation into Taxis and PH in London up until the end of September, with conclusions and recommendations made in December, so any response to HAL/BAA would be premature.

The Trade were asked to meet again in August to discuss Andy Cameron’s proposals but Sean Taylor said that he was unavailable on the suggested date, so we await a new one. However, that is unlikely to be before September as it’s the holiday season and there are other priorities with the City Hall investigation.

We have just heard today that Terminal 1 is to be closed down and vacuum packed due to the high amount of asbestos in the building. We await confirmation.

Mark White.


Taxi and Private Hire smartphone apps in London Letter to all drivers and private hire operators

Latest TFL press release :

This notice provides an update to all taxi and private hire drivers and private hire operators regarding the use of smartphone apps in London. The content of this notice has also been sent directly to all licensed drivers and operators.

The taxi and private hire trades play a vital role in London’s transport system, carrying over half a million passengers around the Capital every day.
I am conscious that the growth in the use of smart phones is changing the way many of us organise our lives, with passengers and drivers
increasingly using apps that serve London’s taxi and private hire market.

While apps offer tremendous potential benefits, TfL as the regulator has a duty to ensure that the way in which they operate complies with the licensing and regulatory framework in London. Over the last few months you will have seen a lot in the media about this, in particular about the Uber app, and I this note explains our current position on the use of smart phone technology.


As you will know, private hire vehicles in London are prohibited from being equipped with taximeters. However, it is not unlawful for a private hire operator to charge its customers on the basis of time taken and distance travelled in respect of journeys. TfL’s view is that smartphones that transmit location information (based on GPS data) between vehicles and operators, have no operational connection with the vehicles, and receive information about fares which are calculated remotely from the vehicle, are not taximeters within the meaning of the legislation (section 11 of the Private Hire Vehicles (London) Act 1998).
The main taxi and private hire trade organisations fundamentally disagree with how the law should be applied to the use of smart phones in this way. TfL has no specific vested interest in which interpretation is correct, other than that we would like clarity so we can regulate the industry and enforce effectively where necessary and appropriate.

In order for us to resolve this issue as quickly and fairly as possible, allowing all interested parties to make representations, we consider the most appropriate way forward is to invite the High Court to issue a declaration as to how the law should be applied in this area.

However, we are now aware that the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association (LTDA) has commenced private prosecutions in the Magistrates’ Court against a number of individual drivers who use the Uber app. These cases will delay the resolution of this issue as the High Court cannot be invited to issue a declaration while there are ongoing criminal proceedings. Nor will the private prosecutions provide a definitive legal position on this issue, as the decisions of one Magistrates’ Court are not binding on another.
Rather than resolving this issue quickly and fairly, we believe that the LTDA actions are prolonging the inherent uncertainty on this issue and are unfairly pursuing a small number of licensed private hire drivers which we are of the view is not in the public interest. It would be preferable for the LTDA to withdraw their private prosecutions and work with us to get the issues before the High Court as soon as possible in order to get a definitive resolution.
Record keeping and recording of destination

The Licensed Private Hire Car Association (LPHCA) assert that the regulations relating to record keeping for private hire operators require a destination to be recorded before the commencement of a journey on all occasions.
TfL is of the view that the law as it currently stands only requires operators to record a destination if a passenger specifies one at the time of booking and not otherwise. We do however agree that these regulations are unclear on this point. The power to make the regulations is now vested in TfL. We therefore intend to consult on potential revisions to the regulations to provide clarity and help ensure the highest standards of public safety and customer service are maintained. More details of this consultation will be publicised later this year.

Uber’s operating model

Concerns have been raised regarding the nature of Uber’s business operating model in London. While it is right that TfL takes into account the reasoned views of others as to how the law should be applied, our role as regulator is to reach an independent view of the law, without improper influence, taking into account all relevant considerations.

In April we carried out TfL’s largest ever compliance inspection and at the time of that inspection Uber met all requirements for a private hire operation in relation to record keeping. We have also been in extensive correspondence with Uber to understand precisely how their business model operates in London.
Following this review, we have reached the conclusion that the way Uber operates in London is in accordance with the law as it applies to private hire operators and specifically in the way bookings are accepted and invited. However, TfL is aware of one incidence where it appears that a driver may have carried out private hire bookings for Uber using a vehicle without insurance and that matter is being dealt with appropriately.

Technology continues to advance quickly and we will continue to monitor developments in way that the market develops in London to ensure that operators and drivers remain compliant.

I would like to emphasise that TfL continues to recognise, and defend, the important distinction between the services provided by taxis and private hire vehicles. TfL is therefore continuing to defend the right of taxis to utilise bus lanes in the ongoing litigation including at the European Court of Justice.

Leon Daniels
Managing Director – Surface Transport Transport for London

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Reply